Saturday, April 23, 2011

True charity does not spring from...

True charity does not spring from government bureaucrats. 
Rather, it comes from the desire to do the right thing.


The Lehigh Valley 9-12/Tea Party making the news at Heritage Action for America

Friday, April 22, 2011

Glaring Contradictions

There they are, staring us in the face. Things that make you go hmmm...

The same people who are telling us that "We're not broke" are at the same time demanding an increase in the Federal debt ceiling.

Friday, April 15, 2011

So... how you doin'?

Imagine you pick up your ringing telephone and the person on the other side politely asks if you would like to participate in a survey. "Sure, why not?", you say and then you're asked one of the following questions:


  • “In general, would you say that your health is excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor?” 
  • “Thinking about your physical health, which includes physical illness and injury, for how many days during the past 30 days was your physical health not good?” 
  • “Thinking about your mental health, which includes stress, depression, and problems with emotions, for how many days during the past 30 days was your mental health not good?” 


After you take that survey and it becomes a dim memory other people are tabulating the answers and using them as the statistical base of a nationwide study. You should have been more careful how you answered, you may have just increased your taxes. Yes, if you're not feeling well there's a politician out there ready to use it as an excuse to initiate a solution.

The answers to those three questions are the basis for fomulating statistics in the following three areas:

  • Poor or fair health.
  • Poor physical health days.
  • Poor mental health days.


Those three statistics, along with one other statistic - low birth weight, are used in calculating the level of morbidity in a survey area. Usually when you hear the word morbidity you would think of "morbidly obese" or of someone who is constantly missing work due to chronic bad health. That is not the case here, adult body weight or work loss days do not make up this statistic. The majority of the morbidity ranking is based on your survey answers in that phone call.

So you could have a low birth weight rating that is about average but if enough people answer their phone poll negatively you will end up with a high morbidity ranking. That is the case with Northampton county, our morbidity ranking consistently stinks. So please, when you get that call, paint on a smile and look on the brighter side of life!

So why does any of this matter? Why would a survey that is so obviously subjectively weighted according to the mood or temperment of the respondents mean anything in the real world? The answer lies in who makes use of these surveys, policy advocates and political wonks.

That morbidity rating is presented as an "ironclad case" by a policy advocate for the formation of a bi-county health board in this article on the local Patch news service. Then that article is picked up by another writer as proof positive that we need to vote out the "pro-morbidity" politicians that oppose the health board. Read it here. But no one reading these articles knows what goes into formulating this very subjective morbidity ranking. But now you know.

So your cranky answer on that phone survey gave one set of politicians an excuse to create a program and caused another group to be labeled "pro-morbidity". You really need to be more careful of what you say on the phone when somone asks, "How you doin'?"

Note:
The survey results are found HERE. Poking around that site on the individual rankings will give you all the information about it found in this article.

Friday, April 8, 2011

Where did the money go?

Local website explains why the budget woes for all the local school districts happened this year and not previously when the economy first took it's downturn. "Where did the money go?"

Sunday, April 3, 2011

It's Sunday...

It's Sunday, often referred to by Christians as the Lord's Day.

This post is in reaction to something I read on another blog. It was someone who felt they had to point out that there were Sunday morning sermons on this blog, a blog associated with the Lehigh Valley Tea Party. It went on complaining about right wing extremism along with the usual nonsensical boilerplate that accompanies such blathering.

First let me point out that since January, when lvtp.org was launched, this ceased being the official web presence of the Lehigh Valley 9-12/Tea Party. I changed the "about" page to explain that change and appended the text in the link below the banner to include the word "Unofficial".

But really, why does it matter? If I posted an article on the lvtp.org website, here, or anywhere with references to the Bible and a belief in God and Christ why would some people consider it wrong, extreme, or in bad taste? Nobody is forcing you to read it, you're always a click away from something else. The criticism that was leveled on the other blog wasn't even specific to what was in my posts, it was simply the fact that it was a sermonette that he apparently found so troubling that he felt the need to share.

So what's the problem? I'm open to constructive criticism.