Monday, May 13, 2013

Help end the school property tax now

The short presentation (9 minutes)



NOW is the time to contact your state representative and senator.
The Pennsylvania General Assembly – Find Your Legislator

The thorough presentation from the nonpartisan Pennsylvania Coalition of Taxpayer Associations (40 minutes) 




hb_sb_76_full_logo 

 From the Pennsylvania Taxpayers Cyber Coalition:
There is no “Holy Grail” of property tax reform. Any property tax reform measure will involve shifting the tax levy from one type of tax to another – there’s no free ride. But there are ways to fund our schools and to ensure a better education for our children that are fairer and more effective than property taxes.
Many Pennsylvanians lose their homes and a lifetime’s work to sheriff’s sales each year because they can no longer afford to pay their property taxes. Senior citizens on fixed incomes are increasingly forced to sell their homes because of unrelenting increases in their tax burden. Young families cannot afford to purchase a home because the per-month property tax escrow is simply too high. Multi-generational family farms are being sold piece by piece to pay property taxes, devastating Pennsylvania agriculture. School districts in areas of the state with limited population and no commercial tax base are in distress and are unable to afford to give their children a quality education. Job losses, out migration, and abysmal state economic performance caused by burdensome property taxes are devastating Pennsylvania’s economy.
To read more click here: http://www.ptcc.us/solution.htm
NOW is the time to contact your state representative and senator.
The Pennsylvania General Assembly – Find Your Legislator
More on this in the newspapers (this list is updated as more articles appear):
Reading Eagle  …the school tax is based on the antiquated notion that a person who owns property has lots of money.
Lebanon Daily News …  ”an engaged and outraged public may be the only power capable of forcing a majority of lawmakers to do what is right.”
Shippensburg News-Chronicle …HB76, sponsored by state Rep. Jim Cox (R-129), has 62 co-sponsors, both Republican and Democrat.

Saturday, August 11, 2012

If we don’t do it who will?


“If we don’t do it who will?” is often the appeal to get someone motivated, to get something done. But look around you and really answer the question. Who will? Sometimes I think there's nobody out there.

Take the “Chick-fil-a” incident last week. Maybe a strange place for me to make my point, after all didn't thousands take the time to make a statement in favor of the first amendment by dining there? Sure they did, and good for them and good for you if you did. But now what?

What precipitated this reaction was the statements of mayors and councilmen in major cities around the country that wanted to condemn and possibly deny Chick-fil-a restaurants in their municipalities. All because the president of the company expressed a belief in what he called biblical marriage.

So we all had our moment of solidarity and ate chicken. And maybe we'll eat more chicken, more often. But has the problem been addressed? This is a problem more grave than what a person chooses to believe and support or even the audacity of the politician's reactions. Where is the outrage? Where is the condemnation?

What's the problem?

The problem is that too many just don't see a problem. That is, politicians thinking it's their job to bully and threaten a business because they disagree with an executive's philosophy or religion. Other politicians not taking a stand by condemning such bullying as acting stupidly by being in opposition to the 1st amendment. And the worst crime, the apathy of the voters who put these bullies in office. Yet even worse, the one's that cheer them on. So, when they come up for reelection, will the Chick-fil-a incident be a plus or minus for them? That we can't even answer that question is an indictment of our times.

Is there anybody out there? Hello?

Mucking around in moral questions

We don't like mucking around in other people's business. The tea party tends to rally around the issues of freedom and the pocketbook, “Taxed Enough Already”, and not in what is generally called “social conservatism”. But it takes a moral people to respect and protect another person's freedom and wallet. The golden rule is where these things intersect.

This is not about the government's definition of marriage. This is about elected government officials grasping for power that does not belong to them. While Chick-fil-a appreciation day was going on the Health and Human Resources insurance mandate went into effect. All insurance plans must cover abortion inducing drugs, regardless of the religious or moral convictions of the employer who pays for it or the person being covered. The freedom of conscious of the people is now subject to the dictates of the state. Abortifacients may not be an issue with which you have a concern, but the freedom of conscience protected by the First Amendment should be. Remember the golden rule...

Integrity is doing the right thing, even when no one is watching

We want our politicians to do the right thing, that's why we put them in office. But if every vote they make is available for public record and yet they are unafraid to go against the constitution, the wishes of the electorate, or common sense... we have failed. They have shown a willingness to do the wrong thing, even when everyone could be watching. What can we do?

We can show up. Someone once said that most of life is showing up. We can shine light on the actions of these politicians. But what if they don't care, like the municipal bullies? Then it's our job to make them care by making sure the voters understand why the issues matter and how their representatives vote.

We want our officials to have integrity, but even the best can use a person looking over their shoulder and giving them encouragement. If we have people that have no apparent integrity then we have to cause them to at least act like they do. Our job is to educate both the politician and the voter on the issues.

Should a Tax Have the Power to Leave You Homeless?

On the LVTP website you will see an effort to fill a bus for a trip to Harrisburg. One of our members looked around and realized, “If we don't do it, who will?”. So she is organizing this trip. The principle is simple – Should a tax have the power to leave you homeless? Change doesn't happen by itself and legislators in Harrisburg are no different than most people, resistant to change. They need our encouragement and they need to put this to a vote so the voters will know where they stand on the issue.

Hiding Spending Doesn't Reduce Spending


Tuesday, July 24, 2012

“What do you have that you did not receive?”

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men...
That is called “The American Creed” because that is the idea of America. America is often called the only nation not based on a people, race, culture, or even geography – but that it is a nation based on an idea. And of all the passages in America's founding documents that creed is the undisputed embodiment of that idea. With those ideas as a foundation a country like ours can emerge. And we, over two centuries later, can look back on what our founders have done with a feeling of immense gratitude.
“If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.”
That quote is commonly attributed to Issac Newton, the famous 17th century scientist. The meaning is generally understood that we, in the present generation, see further because we have benefited from the efforts of those of previous generations. It has an all-encompassing scope in that practically everything we enjoy is because somebody before us has discovered, invented, or prepared the way. No generation begins from scratch. We, those of us in the present, did not discover fire, invent the wheel, or blaze the routes that eventually became our highways. Somebody else did that.

Civilization, technology, and this country are all gifts that we received when we were born into this nation. We have always understood the need to build on this legacy and to pass it on to those that follow. But now, just how that is accomplished is being called into question.

This didn't happen overnight, and it wasn't a plot foisted on us by some shadowy group. We have done it to ourselves. People can't even agree when it started. Some will say the 60's, others go back a hundred years, and still others say it's the inexorable decline that happens whenever any society grows lax in safeguarding itself. I'm talking about bankruptcy – fiscal, moral, and social bankruptcy. Forty cents of every dollar our government spends is borrowed money. An unsustainable practice that can best be described as a crime against the next generation. And the “American Creed” - the idea that governments are instituted to secure our rights, not the materialism of entitlements – has not been successfully taught and passed on.
“What do you have that you did not receive?”
You may have recognized that the title of this piece is a Bible verse (1st Corinthians 4:7) or you may have thought it was a reference to some current political campaign silliness (“You didn't build that!") The ambiguity is the point and selling government as the source of your blessings is the sin, so to speak. And it's nothing new, or particular to one administration or party. Before this we had something called “compassionate conservatism” and “faith based” initiatives. A competition between politicians to see who is the best “brother's keeper” is leaving us broke and far from the American Creed. That is what is happening. The previous administration gave us “Medicare Part D”, the current tops that with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ObamaCare). Government becomes the Good Samaritan and we all get to cross to the other side of the street in good conscience (Luke 10:25-37)

Being grateful for the freedoms (and roads, teachers, firemen, police) we enjoy in this country was always expressed in patriotism - stepping up to defend your country, volunteering, charity, community pride and functions. Now it's been reduced class envy and paying your taxes. This has to be done because more money is needed to provide for the ever growing list of entitled benefits. The latest is free cell phones and cell service for anyone already on assistance.

It is just a continual grab for money - there is only one reason to soak the rich, and it's the same reason thieves rob banks - because that is where the money is. Money that is being deemed better spent by the government than by the people who earned it. It is as simple as that, there's no fairness or morality behind it. Even middle class homes have been targeted by some local governments, transferred to large corporations for the promise of higher tax revenues with the court's blessing. It's just a constant greedy grubbing for money by the government class (R's and D's) that thinks it's their job to spend it. Those who rail against corporations for unfair practices often fail to realize that government itself has been becoming the most corrupt and greedy of all corporations, handing out loan guarantees and out-right grants to favored businesses. A government constrained to the limits of the “American Creed” could not grant favored status on others.

We need the return of "The American Creed".

Saturday, April 28, 2012

My new view on RINOs, PA style

   Every so often I'll go off on a rant, my "RINO" rant. It's basically my frustration that the party has so called "RINOs" throughout their leadership yet that fact does not tarnish the name "Republican". Some mythical ideal of what "Republican" means is retained even while all evidence points to the contrary. In other words, refusing to attribute Republican status on those you claim are RINOs is just sticking your head in the sand. If RINO's are running the party then they are the true Republicans.

   This year the Pennsylvania Republican party has come into sharper focus to further illustrate my point.

   First, it starts with party endorsements in the primary. Why should there be any primary endorsements? A primary is meant to send the message that these are the candidates we want and we're concerned about the issues they ran on. It is the one time the entire "membership" gets to express itself. For it to go in the opposite direction, for the leadership from above to dictate its pleasure to us below, is an affront to thinking voters.

   And then there is the matter of who they endorse. Is it just me, or does it seem like it's usually the least conservative candidate who gets the nod? This year was no exception, the pick for the US Senate race was a recent party-switcher who even admitted to voting for our current Democratic president (I guess we can give him "points" for being forthcoming). Perhaps the party could better serve itself if it would educate us on all of the candidates instead of endorsing them...

   But education is not their style, obfuscation is. Something else this past election illuminated. A few days before election day many of us received e-mails from friends in the Ron Paul political camp. They were eager to let us know which candidates running to be delegates to the GOP convention were committed to Ron Paul. That's understandable, you want your team at the convention and the Republican ballot does not reveal who the delegate will vote for (the Democrat ballot does!). Wait, you may be thinking, don't they have to vote for the winner of the popular vote in their district or state? At least on the first ballot? No they don't. And these are the party rules, not the state government's regulations.

   But apparently this system is working for them (whoever it is that makes these rules). Even though the Paul delegate candidates were apparently the only ones that ran a campaign to publicize their delegates, and it was next to impossible to find out who the others were committed to, it looks like they didn't do that well. It looks like name recognition won the day, from what I can tell.

   And then there's the new district gerrymandering. A look at the map says it all...
http://www.politicspa.com/pas-new-congressional-maps/30096/
http://www.redistricting.state.pa.us/Maps/Congressional.cfm

   If this was a normal association or club I belonged to would I put up with this sort of manipulation? I'd like to think I wouldn't. I'd want to see it changed and if it didn't I would leave.

   So where does that leave me? I think I'm the RINO, a Republican In Name Only. I just vote in Republican primaries in an attempt to influence the party. But my heart is not with them, especially when I observe the self perpetuating nature of this party's rules and methods. If they sweep in November (and I certainly wouldn't mind if they did) it may actually be the end of them. Especially if afterward very little changes and more people begin to take notice.